Tournament: Greenhill | Round: 4 | Opponent: MBA | Judge:
Wynter 2003 (Sylvia, Professor of Romance Languages at Stanford University, "Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom
Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument," CR: The New Centennial Review, 3.3 (2003) 257-337, MUSE)
THE ARGUMENT PROPOSES THAT THE STRUGGLE OF OUR NEW MILLENNIUM WILL be one between the
AND
the other, African enslavement, Latin American conquest, and Asian subjugation.
First - The affirmative’s economic engagement with Latin America is just one more manifestation of 500 years of coloniality—the promise of prosperity, democracy, and security is a toxic fantasy that obscures the trail of dead reaching back through time.
Mignolo 2005, (Walter, Duke University, "THE IDEA OF LATIN AMERICA", 2005, 6/28/13|Ashwin)
The logic of coloniality can be understood as working through four wide domains of human
AND
very idea of both "America" and "Latin" America..4ever
Second - The Affirmative’s management by extraction is part and parcel of a long history of systematic energy violence, exploitation, and securitization– ultimately marking the indigenous populations surrounding the resources a threat to energy security that must be contained.
Banerjee 9 (Subhabrata Bobby, Director of Research at the School of Business, University of Western Sydney, HISTORIES OF OPPRESSION AND VOICES OF RESISTANCE: TOWARDS A THEORY OF THE TRANSLOCAL, REARTIKULACIJA ~239, 2009, http://www.reartikulacija.org/?p=612/)
Management by extraction arises from the endowment curse and is an all too familiar discourse
AND
which means certain communities need to be "eliminated." This is necrocapitalism.
Coloniality naturalizes a non-ethics of death and generalizes the condition of damnation—ongoing genocide, enslavement, rape, ecological destruction and unending war is produced by and reproduces colonial epistmeologies.
Maldonado-Torres 2008 ~Nelson. "Against War : Views from the Underside of Modernity"¶ Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press, 2008. p 215-217¶ http://site.ebrary.com/lib/utexas/Doc?id=1021719126ppg=52~~
Dussel, Quijano, and Wynter lead us to the understanding that what happened in
AND
a world, ontology collapses into a Manicheanism, as Fanon suggested.72
The alternative is the definitive rejection of epistemic privilege and total decolonization. The starting point for the decolonial option is the repudiation of death ethics in the name of life. Dewesternization alone or continuing faith in the project of modernity fails to undermine the overrepresentation of man.
Mignolo 09 (Walter, Professor of literature-Duke University, Ph.D. from the Ecole des Hautes Etudes, academic director of Duke in the Andes-http://www.aas.duke.edu/study_abroad/andes/index.php, an interdisciplinary program in Latin American and Andean Studies in Quito, Ecuador at Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and the Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, "Epistemic Disobedience,¶ Independent Thought and¶ De-Colonial Freedom" ,Theory, Culture 26 Society 2009)
ONCE UPON a¶ time scholars assumed that the knowing subject in¶ the disciplines
AND
who take ’originality’ as the ultimate criterion for the final¶ judgment.