Tournament: Obligatory Disclosure | Round: 2 | Opponent: The police | Judge:
Security discourse of Emergency is abused by the state by normalizing an ever-increasing state of fear in order to justify any action in the name of security.
Neocleous 8 Mark Neocleous, Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University, 08 ("Critique of Security", McGill-Queen’s University, pp. 67-69, Published 2008)
Part of the reason for this is that the concept of ’emergency’ evokes images of
AND
it tell us about the way ’security’ is used as a political tool?
The Affirmative is a healthy dose of ideology instead of coming to terms with the irrational nature of economic engagement policy they only attempt to secure economic engagement making sure nothing ever really changes. Unfortunately their hope sustained in security guarantees is misplaced as ideology only operates by never fulfilling its promise of security- the result is only the creation of more threats to be secured by the West.
Daly, 2004, (Glyn, Risking the Impossible, http://www.lacan.com/zizek-primer.htm-http://www.lacan.com/zizek-primer.htm) SRM
Zizek has been concerned crucially to demonstrate the way in which ideology serves to support
AND
today’s realpolitik; in today’s cynical assertion of the way things actually are.
Securitization is a precondition for genocide. Their advantage descriptions will be used to justify massive violence.
Friis 00 (Karseten, UN Sector – Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, "From Liminars to Others: Securitization Through Myths", Peace and Conflict Studies, 7(2), http://shss.nova.edu/pcs/journalsPDF/V7N2.p df~23page=2-http://shss.nova.edu/pcs/journalsPDF/V7N2.p20df)
The problem with societal securitization is one of representation. It is rarely clear in
AND
on behalf of the natural and eternal, where truth is never questioned.
Disorder and insecurity are inevitable. Attempting to control danger is the impetus for global destruction
Der Derian 98 (James, Professor of Political Science – University of Massachusetts, On Security, Ed. Lipschutz, p. 24-25)
No other concept in international relations packs the metaphysical punch, nor commands the disciplinary
AND
on the otherness of death, and identities calcifying into a fearful sameness.
There is no value to life within a securitized subjectivity, it is the zero point to the holocaust embedded and permeated into every social field of our existence.
Dillon 96 ~Michael, Senior Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at the University of Lancaster, Politics of Security: Towards a Political Philosophy of Continental Thought, p. 26~
Everything, for example, has now become possible. But what human being seems
AND
for example, through strategic discourse— even if the details have changed.
Vote Neg to reject the dominant framing of security. This critical praxis is the only real chance of change in this debate round and acts as a prerequisite to effective policy solutions.
Bruce 96 (Robert, Associate Professor in Social Science – Curtin University and Graeme Cheeseman, Senior Lecturer – University of New South Wales, Discourses of Danger and Dread Frontiers, p. 5-9)
This goal is pursued in ways which are still unconventional in the intellectual milieu of
AND
resistant to them, or choose not to understand them, and why?
Both their harm and solvency claims are false. Advantages are random factoids politically constructed to make the plan appear to be a good idea.
Dillon and Reid 00 (Michael, Professor of Politics – University of Lancaster, and Julian, Lecturer in International Relations – King’s College, "Global Governance, Liberal Peace, and Complex Emergency", Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, January / March, 25(1))
More specifically, where there is a policy problematic there is expertise, and where
AND
detailed ways in which life is variously (policy) problematized by it.
Questions of representations come first – the way we discuss policy is more important than policy itself and shapes our understanding of the world
Doty 96 Roxanne Lynn Doty, Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at Arizona State University, 1996 (Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations, University of Minnesota Press, Borderlines Series, ISBN 0816627622, p. 5-6)
This study begins with the premise that representation is an inherent and important aspect of
AND
are articulated with the exercise of political, military, and economic power.
The Alternative is to reject the Affirmative’s security discourse – the act of situating ourselves against security in all forms through the means of debate is the only way to be emancipated from the deep entrenchment of security in our minds and society.
Neocleous 8 Mark Neocleous, Professor of the Critique of Political Economy at Brunel University, 08 ("Critique of Security", McGill-Queen’s University, pp. 184-186, Published 2008)
The only way out of such a dilemma, to escape the fetish, is
AND
- it requires us to be brave enough to return the gift.143